Sex Trafficking group Presentation

32 billion dollars??!!!!!! Really??!!!!! 32 billion dollars is profited from the human trafficking trade, 80 percent being women and small children. And 70 % of the female victims are for the sex slave industry. American is one of the top three importers of human trafficking. Suddenly everything I touch seems unclean. Have I touched money that exchanged between the hands of a trader. Was this 20 dollars in my pocket used to buy an hour of  some dark fantasy realized in a small room at the back of a massage parlor. They say you can tell a man's character by how he treats his dog. Does this apply to humans? Can you judge a countries character by how it treats its most unfortunate citizens? Then again these victims, these are not our citizens so what jurisdiction do they fall under, should they depend on for justice if their own country refrained from saving them.  

Relief...thats all I felt when I found out I was a man ( Gender a biological concept?)

Two days ago while frantically preparing for my exam, I came a across a story in my in psych book about a boy raised as a girl. The mother was pregnant with identical twin boys. Months after their birth, one of the twins sustained an injury that damaged its sex organs; a botched circumcision that caused massive bleeding and later infection. During their son's surgery to remove the infection, the parents decided that the surgeon should continue to remove his entire penile organs and create a vagina instead.

"Oh baby baby how was I suppose to know, that my director was in Porno" - The actual accounted lyrics of the Britney Spears song

So basically my jaw hit the floor when I found out two classes ago that Mandy Moore and Britney Spears first debut videos were directed by a former porn director. Now I would like to think that maybe someday I can live by the code of benefit of the doubt, but if 95% of the videos the director made before were porn then he must use the same directing techniques in these videos. Our society is sick! I am all out convinced and at this point, I pray I have good sense to really think before I have kids. Our culture has deeply rooted pornographic values all through out our schools, workplaces and media. Porn creates a revenue of 10 billion dollars within our society; that's 10 billion dollars of porn movies/events/ and other paraphernalia that our economy banks on from U.S consumers. I am a huge proponent of one's personal rights/freedoms and sexual exploitation bought in a CD or online value packages is an example of those rights. However, there are those who wish to not have porn in their bought and paid for media. There are parents who do not wish for their little boys and girls to witness overt porn-like sexuality of their Disney hero. But maybe ignorance in bliss. If they do not know that Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, Mandy Moore had their billboard #1 hit music videos directed by a porn star then maybe they wouldn't be susceptible to ideals of the porn industry.  And maybe breast implants can provide children with natural milk and Viagra can turn your sex life into a never ending roller coaster of orgasms. But we don't live at Walgreen's and the world is prone to cause and effect. my nieces love the younger Britney spear videos and songs and they love Miley Cyrus even when she dances in bird feathers behind a cage. I am scared really scared because they are so young and brilliant but they will not recognize their potential if they are bombarded by sexual images of their idols. I see them so easily feeling inadequate and ugly because they do not fit these ideals. All because the music industry saw dollar signs at the prospect of hiring a porn director for their upcoming teen stars. I see no difference between "Girls Gone Wild and these videos.
There is something wrong with our culture, some dark lust for sexualized young, hairless girls and boys. We are one of the top three importers of human trafficking, more than 70% being women and young children. Is anybody out there? Can anybody see this? Its too obvious!!! Its in our faces!!! Or is it that nobody wants to see, hear realize that each and every one of us is part of the problem.
" A hideous truth is a terrible thing to waste"

A strength of a man is what he endures, a free man is never conquered.

I can smell the sweat, feel the whip thin reeds, see the endless cotton among which appeared shadows drifting across fields of clouds. Acres and  acres of high grade soil enriched with the black blood and toil of slaves. The Cotton Gin a powerful symbol of the economic glory of the confederate south. Frederick Douglass was simply another form of the labor and capital exchanged among the various markets, stud men, good workers, dumb too. This kind of suppression leaves no room for the maturation of the soul. Under constant ridicule, subjugation and dominance, African Americans identified themselves as inferior, feeble, powerless. This state of mind passed on through to the generations that preceded them. Generations until men, like Frederick Douglass broke through the barricade of his conditioned mindset and became the impossible, free.
Historians believed that the first moment that Frederick started living his destiny was the day his owner sold him to a cruel farmer on a neighboring property. This new master was known for his ruthless treatment, his discipline, his inflexible expectations of good crops and premium profits. Not one slave remained unbroken on his land if the chose not to, death would be their only gain. Douglass was a young boy, anxious, scared of his new home. So what made him do it, what made him rebel?  After over 400 years of oppression molding his culture and identity was stirred the man to fight?
After a day of strenuous work, Douglass fainted and lost the strength to get up. The overseer called the owner and the owner preceded to whip Douglass. Douglass was beaten until he bled from his skull. He fled after the beating to his old master who simply sent him back to the plantation. Frederick and his owner clash and rather than cower, he fights back and beats his master.
The readings are great because they idolize Frederick Douglass, but identity this moment in time is a condoning of physical violence in order to gain worth. Frederick was a slave, third class at best. He would always be inferior, no matter if he was smart, honest, talented or insightful he was a slave, property. I hate the fact that in historians eyes ( who were definitely all male), regarded this event as defining Frederick Douglass of ultimately making him a man. He had to beat the dominant man down and only when he did so did he gain worth. Therefore this says to me that violence, dominance is what equals freedom.

Height Matters: Face to Boobs

A women reaches puberty when she develops curves, boobs and receives that monthly down payment from mother nature. A man reaches puberty when he develops a deeper voice, develops body and muscle mass and grows taller. But if a woman happens to not embody one of these characteristics, it would not take away from her femininity. As long as she had feminine features if not a developed body, or dressed feminine if did not have the features. However, I believe that men have to obey all criteria of masculinity in order to be called a man. A man will never wear dresses, talk with a high voice or not partake in the physical pursuits. Men must cannot have women that are taller than they are. Women cannot be in a relationship with men who are shorter than they are. Okay here is the problem: I once had a friend who I began to like after a serious of hangouts and talk sessions. He was charming, real smooth and had confidence, positive confidence. Yosef was a person who got along with everyone, saw the humor in everything etc. Being a rather small guy never seemed to bother him at all. In fact, where Yosef grew up, the middle east, men of short stature was the norm. Women that he had previously interacted with were of relatively small builds with petite figures too. So perhaps he saw no issue of his physique because where he once lived there had been no issues of height which was why he was content and self-confident. I had liked him a lot, I loved hanging out with him and my friends. However, I never thought to tell him how I felt for I was 5'10 and he 5'6. In those four short inches stood the concrete wall called height, a universally accepted norm of men being bigger than women.
He was amazing but I kept thinking how uncomfortable I would be when he hugged me. The awkwardness of the vision set me so ill at ease that

Radical this Eco that

I firmly believe that if we are to overturn the masculine ideals which shape our society, we need a complete overhaul of the structural system that is our culture. Radical feminism calls for the total breakdown of the patriarchal system, education, politics, home life and language. That is ultimately what we would have to do if we want immediate results. I believe we are in danger of believing that as soon as women are equated with men then there are no more gains to be made. Yet, I believe it would lead us to the same end result we have now, glorified violence, sexualized TV and the continual objectification of men and women in their sexual roles. There is a problem that we continually ignore. A woman's worth is still determined by superficially, by her looks, her sexuality and her ability to be ageless. Women must always attain this double standard of being smart, ambitious but charming, feminine and definitely not a bitch.
It is the conundrum of the virgin slut. It is worse if your a tease than if you are a ho, however, both will result in your reputation being tarnished. But girls do it because it is seen as a trait of the ideal woman, to be a seductive innocent. But what is this word innocence, what exactly is so pure, sacred about virginity, is it a biological barrier

The Liberal Feminist is.........

    Last class we were split into groups where each group was to define a term that was discussed in our readings. As we were discussing gender concepts of labor, Cecilia talked about the dichotomy of the home. Traditionally with stay at home moms, the woman provides the free labor for their husbands who can then spend the time at a job making money. This money then comes back to the wife who can spend the money at her leisure. This interdependent process is a very interesting insight into what a marriage is. A business arrangement where labor is exchanged for money and success in money equals harmony. So where is the love? Or does love grow from security and comforts. And if so should we pick someone who is wealthy since money and security are what promises a happy marriage? How many American marriages are happy when the spouses live a low socio-economic lifestyle?
Liberal feminism also gets a lot of shit for being anti- male. Most movements were centered around women trying to overcome obstacles reserved exclusively for men. The "old boys club" as Celia termed it in class on day. Yet,  I think it has all  been misconstrued. Look, we come from a patriarchal society. We are held by standards, the majority of which were discovered by men. When women sought equality or liberation in her society, she asked that the standard rules that prevented her from doing so, would change, expand to include the opposite sex. But this means highlighting a fallacy within the very fabric of common thought. The ideas of Descartes, Niche, Freud, Marx, Smith, Locke, all male historic figures which have shaped the American dream, created democracy and laid done the premise for the global market, would fall under doubt.
 Humans have a remarkable evolutionary skill to change and adapt to different environments. Yet, we have  a remarkable ability to be so stubborn in our ideals. Any great social change has always resulted in some type of conflict (war). And yet the change is more apt to do us more good than harm. Radical feminism calls for the over-turning of the social structures which causes the oppression of women everywhere. This means confronting those good old boys and forcing them to meet women at the negotiating table